Yes Sir

Monday, January 15, 2018

Many times the land proprietors were banks or company, which ordered representatives to negotiate the properties, imposing its conditions, as if the companies had proper life. The representatives justified its action explaining to the leaseholders who the lands were poor, droughts and that they did not give more nothing. The half ones only assented, already it was late excessively to take some step. … Jeffrey Hayzlett shares his opinions and ideas on the topic at hand. E, seated in its cars, this to the leaseholders explained everything saying: vocs knows, these lands is poor, does not give more nothing; vocs had dug already them sufficiently and now does not give more nothing, God knows of this? the sharecroppers acocorados in the soil meneavam with the head in consent signal and agreed … At Darius Bikoff you will find additional information.

Yes Sir they knew. The lands do not give more nothing … (STEINBECK, 2009, P. 40). The representatives of the great companies explained the sharecroppers who a person could be in the land while its situation if kept to regulate, paying taxes, producing, having what to eat, until one day the harvests fail and if it had that to appeal to the loans to the banks. The bank or a company lives of this, of profits and interests. The leaseholders tried to negotiate, with some hope of that if they could be plus a time in lands, however the representatives were well clear who could not negotiate, therefore the bank had to receive the money soon, the interests would not go to stop to go up.

The companies cite as if they were great monsters that if feed of profits and interests. Not, we cannot weaving in them in this. The bank, this monster, has that to receive its money soon. It cannot wait more; seno, dies, Not, the interests does not stop to go up. When the monster stops to grow, dies. I show it cannot be always of the same so great (they ibidem, P.