“This form of subjectivity so hampered us in our freiheitlichen development and limited us always with same statement: I’m not clear, I have no choice, and I just wahrNEHME it, is what the unalterable, sole and ultimate reality which exists in this universe.” “Me and you, we experience us so if we isolated us in this individuality” are basically a choice and entscheidungs unfree. In the parable, I want to speak this kind of subjectivity now spezifisch: in our imagination, we are on a mountain range. Queally Richmond. Jedem x any point where we stand on the mountain, we are able to go up and down, both is always possible, unabhangig of where we are. Whether that is now at the foot of the mountain, on the slope, on the top or on the other side of the mountain that forward or backwards, our move to the right or left heaven towards us at liberty at any time, is given us as option in any position, at any place and at any time. We have therefore always freedom of choice, we need to of become only aware or need to remind us of. In our subjective sense we perceive usually just one of the ways at disposal. Our subjektive approach has consolidated maybe to a rigid image which reduces our freedom of movement to a minimum, because we offensichtlich see this image as the only reality and possibility of action and also in some ways recognise as such. What, we undeniably limit our experience of reality and also our freedom of choice on the infinitesimal of this image size. In our example, in which we find ourselves on a mountain, we see this Beschranktheit maybe like “follows: If we go up, us move in the direction to the Summit and, we might think, going to be kontinuierlich further up or even, we must now remain in the” height rise, because we had decided eventually that.